I appreciate this very nuanced and historically rooted take. I think you might be right — things like the UofC letter, among many others, have lead to “trigger” getting a bad name. The data (cited in my piece above) suggests that a lot of faculty provide informal warnings about content verbally or textually, similar to the one you described your teacher using. In those cases, students are getting a TW without anyone labelling it as such, so it’s less politicized. That’s fine by me. I’m sure that works as well or better than a quick, two-word TW before a lecture or on a syllabus. I hope that TWs aren’t totally given a bad name for good, though, because some students have found the language of them and the process of asking for them to be a useful self-advocacy tool. It’s easier to email me and say “hey can you TW blood” than it is for a student to sit down with me in office hours and explain what the issue is or why they have it. But we’ll see how the tide rolls on this one.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store